| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
407
   |
Posted - 2012.08.03 02:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hell and people think care bears whine alot.
The amount of tears from gankers and now pirates are hilarious and it all seems to stem from inability to adapt.
You know adapt, the very thing that people have been telling carebears to do for years. Sure lo-sec will change and more people will want to use it. Not just noobs, Vets and pirates. More players will probably enter lo-sec if there were not smart bombing idiots sitting at gates for hours a day, hoping to pop some ones pod.
Yes you will have to work more for kills and actually PvP.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
416
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 01:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:According to the CSM on Eve Radio just now this was simply a miscommunication in the CSM minutes. It was not actually presented as it was represented in the minutes:
The CSM minutes reads as so: "CCP Greyscale moves on to explain his work on sentry guns. Sentry guns will now shoot anyone with a criminal flag, suspect or otherwise. ... **go on to explain how sentry guns are gonna blap everything on field** ..."
It should read as so: "CCP Greyscale moves on to brainstorm with the CSM about sentry guns."
I don't know if I believe it given the CSM responses to my blog post... but w/e. I think the point that this is a bad idea and should not be implemented (as described) has been made.
-Liang
I love your quote "So what gives, guys? Why didnGÇÖt you object to deleting PVP real PVP from low sec?"
Sorry to tell you but gate camping is not real PvP, as is shown by the people who now hide in Orcas if things get to tough.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
416
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 09:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: and none of us on the CSM really felt like whoring for constituent cred
What not whoring yourselves for constituents. Whats next failure to lie to the voters?
This travesty must end, we demand politicians that lie, cheat and get caught with there secretaries, well at least you guys can still scam votes.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
484
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 23:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lo-Sec the place you go when you want to be alone.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
505
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 08:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
Pegaus wrote:This is how its going to go down:
- Alright guys its pretty quiet here should we go camp something?
- Yeah sure
- Whats our numbers?
- Between 5 and 6
- Not enough, we need at least 3 logis.
- Lets just wait for more numbers.
:::eventually fleet logsoff and play starcraft instead:::
I tought that one of the most attractive lowsec characteristics was that it made small pvp possible by using gate tactics, now if you want a fight on a gate you better have a blob and carriers in standby.
Goodbye lowsec pvp...hello carebears...
Hello carebears? Are you insinuating that if they make the lo-sec gate guns make sense then Carebears might go to lo-sec and provide a lot more targets for piracy, not on gates or stations, like belts, anoms ect..?
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
538
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 05:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:lollerwaffle wrote:Myth 9: "More people would go into lowsec if they spawned randomly after jumping" Fact: I have to agree with this one, since it would be almost impossible to kill anyone, unless said person was flying around in a ship with an align time >20 seconds. Proponents of this aren't seriously suggesting that the whole system be blanketed in probes are you? The only way anyone would agree to this is if mission runners had to probe down their missions over the whole constellation, and oh yeah, the NPC with the mission itemn+ƒ It spawns randomly too. Those asteroid belts? Sure, probe down one veldspar roid, mine it, probe the other 9999999999 down one by one. Might as well not label the gates and let's probe those out too.  Sorry for the wall of text, lunch meeting got canceled and I have nothing better to do at work for now. ... unlabelled gates that have to be probed out, that sounds kind of familiar. Wormholes ?! Wait wait, let's pull out the remove/delay/nerf local threads. Now for lowsec ~~~
Nah there are stations in Lo-sec it would never be the same
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
543
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 05:09:00 -
[7] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Gate camps are not prolific. I hop into and out of lowsec many many many times per week and rarely encounter gate camps.
Rancer and Amamake are not indicative of all lowsec/highsec border systems. If you think that, then you're a damned fool.
You might want to start travelling into lowsec, Issler, before spouting off your nonsense.
Gate camps, if there are about all I ever see in Lo-sec.
I have been on runs for over 20 lo-sec jumps and have only seen anyone else on the border to hi-sec.
What the gate gun fix will do long term, I have no idea but lo-sec really needs something to fix it up.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
543
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 07:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
Weed Probe wrote:If you release this I'll kill the cat
So you are in favor of this then?
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
548
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 03:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
What ever the number of gate camps the fact is that they detract from the usefulness of Lo-sec.
As to Usefulness it really does need a purpose other than Gate camping and FW.
The biggest question is 'Why do people want to go there?". All I can think of ATM is to get back out somewhere else.
Lo-sec needs changing, will the gate gun fix make it more useful? No idea but at least it is a change, if people allowed small changes like that one where a frig is actually useful but no ship can sit at the gate forever then maybe lo-sec might evolve into something.
At the moment lo-sec reminds me of primordial sludge, so much promise but at the moment it is just sludge.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
548
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 03:53:00 -
[10] - Quote
I live in low sec so I definitely know what I'm talking about. Last night there was a camp on at least one of the gates ot the three systems I was running trade through for about 90% of the two hours I was on.
Our corp used to operate in a high sec bubble in the middle of low sec and because the major routes in and out were constantly camped we moved almost all our activity out.
Maybe you need to spend more time in low sec.
That is not liveing in losec omfg you realy have no clue do you with idiots like this in csm we are doomed[/quote]
I have lived in lo-sec and came to the inescapable conclusion, Why bother.
The only reasons to be living there are you are either FW or inept at PvP and want to kill noobs and carebears who wander in.
Oh what a joy Lo-sec is right now
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
556
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 10:24:00 -
[11] - Quote
Darek Castigatus wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Darek Castigatus wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Darek Castigatus wrote: I'll spell it out for you just on the off chance you arent trolling and are genuinely this thick. Issler is actually trying to imply that because a lowsec area with features unlike most of the rest of lowsec had a 90 minute camp on it that camping is common place, we all know that for the bullshit it is. So is Issler trolling or genuinely that thick, in your opinion? Honestly I dont know, Im actually hoping for the first because if its the second then its kinda depressing someone that dumb could get on the CSM in the first place. Hm, so (to you) it's better if the CSM person is trolling you. Interesting. If the alternative is an idea that completely destroys my playstyle then yes I would. What i would really like is for them to actually be aware of and educated on issues in an area before they start commenting on it, something Issler has demonstrated an utter lack of ability in despite claiming to live in the area concerned.
Well if you feel that strongly...Run next year for the CSM.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
556
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 10:43:00 -
[12] - Quote
drunk asfck wrote:It be great to get a true pirate onto CSM as long they look afta lo-sec intrests they have my vote and im sure most other lo-sec dwellers votes
becouse atm from isslers veiws and post this dude is utterly clueless in lo-sec matters oh and i forgot he/she lived on hi-sec island that had to pass through lo-sec so he/she must know what they talking about
but good idea lets get a pirate into CSM
The fact that you are getting responses from a CSM is a good thing as it means they are communicating.
The fact they are not telling you what you want to hear is not surprising, they don't have a paid staff to tell them what to say like normal politicians and they do not play the same way you do.
Frankly the fact they are responding is great, no matter what they say but if you disagree run for the CSM or back someone or as pirates threaten some noobs to vote for your candidate.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
557
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 11:27:00 -
[13] - Quote
drunk asfck wrote:m8 comon its not about not earing what i want to ear read isslers posts m8 clearly someone who has no clue about lo-sec life bu t suports the sentry buff now if i dont know about something im not gona put my opinion across make out like i know what im talking about and look like a idiot would be better to do bit resurch go and live with a actual lo-sec crowd for a bit then come back with full understanding of the subject beeing debated not just asume sh!t on miniman experiance and knoladge and about CSM i av no intrest in these matters but i would gladly suport someone running for CSM with 2 years min lo-sec experiance i honestly belive this sentry gun buff has nothing to do with lo-sec pirate gate camps but more to do with opening lo-sec to carbare types to fill the lo-sec planets for Dusty's to fight over Initially, DUST 514 mercenaries will be able to join EVE Online players to participate in factional warfare happening at the contested boundaries between the large EVE Universe empires. http://www.dust514.com/game/faq/
So you want to ***** but you don't want to do it yourself.
And apparently you would prefer if CSM members never said anything because if they did they would always find someone whos opinions they differed too. And as they are unpaid for their time and am sure they would still like to play having them all run off for a bit to every area that everyone complained about would mean that is all they would do. They wouldn't have time to suggest anything to anyone they would be running around with their butts on fire.
The Current CSM has a lo-sec member in it, he is not the one that responded.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
565
|
Posted - 2012.08.27 00:49:00 -
[14] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:drunk asfck wrote:
so u run the camps
you fcking moron you have no clue about lo-sec u PASS through losec to get to your little carbare fuzzy land but on the way you must pas the big bad piwats
wel m8 iv lived lo-se for 3+years and lived 0.0 4 years thats why i post in this thread beouse i actualy know what im on about
fact gate gun buff wil NOT stop gate camps
fact gate gun buff will kill solo/small gang pvp at gates
nothing els to it but can you please TRY and understand it will NOT stop camps
carebares already got enough to help them
regional gates /jump frieghters /cloaky ships/ intel chans / local /scouts
if the care bare cant use his head and use tools given to him they deserve to die simple
dont change something thats not broken just to babysit fck wits and mess the game for thousends of players that actualy use they heads to live in lo-sec
with every post you make issler you look like a tool and the ppl that voted for you must be cringeing at your lack of understanding of the game
Show me on this teddy bear where the carebear touched you. Seriously, you're going to have a stroke. Relax ;).
A stroke, I am surprised he hasn't started to bash him self around the head with his monitor. The rage is incredible.
Oh and strangely having different types of people on the CSM means that there are different views of the game. So yes having a CSM member not agree with you is good, if they all did then the rest of the game would not have a voice.
If you feel you POV isn't expressed on the current CSM, run for CSM or back someone who does. Tell everyone in game why you feel you or your candidate needs to get in.
EG. Educate the Populous.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
565
|
Posted - 2012.08.27 00:51:00 -
[15] - Quote
drunk asfck wrote:that the best you got m8 ? lmfao
just stateing the facts
fact 1 : issler is clueless fck wit
fact 2 : gun buff WONT stop camping
fact 3 : gun buff WILL stop solo/small scale pvp at gates
Facts require evidence or they are just random guesses.
Please state your evidence.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
| |
|